The secrets of the ‘high-potential’ personality
Are there six traits that could really mark out your potential to achieve?
Are you curious, conscientious and
competitive? Do you also have the more mysterious qualities of “high
adjustment”, “ambiguity acceptance” and “risk approach”? If so,
congratulations! According to new psychological research, these six
traits constitute a “high potential” personality that will take you far
in life.
The truth, of course, is a little more nuanced. It turns
out the same traits, in excess, may also impede your performance, and
the real secret to success may be to know exactly where you fall on each
spectrum, and how to make the most of your strengths and account for
your weaknesses. But this new approach promises to be an important step
forward in our bid to understand the complex ways our personality
affects our working life.
Attempts to capture our workplace
personality have, after all, suffered a chequered record in the past.
One of the most popular tests used today is the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, which sorts people according to various thinking styles, such as “introversion/extroversion” and “thinking/feeling”.
As
many as nine out of 10 US companies now use Myers-Briggs to screen
employees. Unfortunately, many psychologists feel that the theory behind the different categories is outdated and fails to correlate with actual measures of performance. One study suggested that the MBTI is not great at predicting managerial success. Some critics even claim that it is pseudoscience.
“As
a conversation starter, it’s a good tool, but if you are using it on a
large scale to predict performance or to try and find high-performing
candidates, it doesn’t work,” says Ian MacRae, a psychologist and
co-author of the book High Potential.
Figuring that recent advances in psychological research could do better, MacRae and Adrian Furnham
of University College London have now identified six traits that are
consistently linked to workplace success, which they have now combined
into the High Potential Trait Inventory (HPTI).
MacRae points out that each trait may also have
drawbacks at extremes, meaning there is an optimal value of each one. He
also emphasises that the relative importance of each trait will be
determined by the job you are doing, so the particular thresholds would
need to be adapted depending on whether you are hoping to succeed in,
say, a technical position. But the version of the test that I have seen
was focused on leadership roles.
With this in mind, the six traits are:
Conscientiousness
Conscientious
people commit themselves to plans and make sure they carry them out to
the letter. They are good at overcoming their impulses and thinking
about the wisdom of their decisions for the long-term. After IQ,
conscientiousness is often considered one of the best predictors of life outcomes like educational success.
At work, high conscientiousness is essential for good strategic
planning, but in excess it may also mean that you are too rigid and
inflexible.
Adjustment
Everyone faces
anxieties, but people with high adjustment can cope with them more
easily under pressure, without allowing it to negatively influence their
behaviour and decision-making. People with low scores on this scale do appear to suffer from poor performance at work, but you can mitigate those effects with the right mindset. Various studies have shown
that reframing a stressful situation as a potential source of growth –
rather than a threat to their wellbeing – can help people to recover
from negative situations more quickly and more productively.
Ambiguity acceptance
Are
you the kind of person who would prefer tasks to be well-defined and
predictable? Or do you relish the unknown? People with a high tolerance for ambiguity
can incorporate many more viewpoints before coming to a decision, which
means they are less dogmatic and more nuanced in their opinions.
“Low
ambiguity tolerance can be considered a kind of dictatorial
characteristic,” MacRae says. “They’ll try to distil complicated
messages into one easy selling point, and that can be a typical trait of
destructive leadership.”
Crucially, someone who can accept
ambiguity will find it easier to react to changes – such as an evolving
economic climate or the rise of a new technology – and to cope with
complex, multifaceted problems. “We’re trying to identify the ability of
leaders to listen to lots of different opinions, to take complex
arguments and to make sense of them in a proactive way, instead of
simplifying them,” MacRae adds. “And we have found that the more senior
you are in a leadership position, the more important that becomes for
decision-making.”
Low ambiguity
acceptance will not always be a drawback. In certain fields – such as
regulation – it can be better to take a more ordered approach that irons
out all the wrinkles in the process. Knowing where you stand on this
spectrum may prevent you from stretching too far from your comfort zone.
Curiosity
Compared
to our other mental traits, curiosity has been somewhat neglected by
psychologists. Yet recent research shows that an inherent interest in
new ideas brings many advantages to the workplace: it may mean that you are more creative and flexible in the procedures you use, help you to learn more easily, increases your overall job satisfaction and protects you from burnout.
In excess, however, curiosity can also lead you to have a “butterfly mind” – flying from project to project without seeing them through.
Risk approach (or courage)
Would
you shy away from a potentially unpleasant confrontation? Or do you
steam ahead in the knowledge that the short-term discomfort will resolve
the situation, bringing long-term benefits? Unsurprisingly, the
capacity to deal with difficult situations is critical for management
positions where you need to take action for the greater good, even when
you are faced with opposition.
Competitiveness
There’s
a fine line between striving for personal success and caving into
unhealthy jealousy of others. At its best, competitiveness can be a
powerful motivation that leads you to go the extra mile; at its worst,
it can lead teams to break down.
Together, these six traits
consolidate most of our understanding to date on the many different
qualities that influence work performance, particularly for those
setting their sights on leadership.
Equally interesting are the
personality traits that MacRae and Furnham haven’t included, however.
The extroversion-introversion scale, for instance, may determine how we
deal with certain social situations, but it seems to make little
difference in overall job performance. Agreeableness – our capacity to
get along with other people – doesn’t appear to predict professional
success.
To
measure each trait in the HPTI, participants have to rate how strongly
they agree or disagree with a series of statements, such as: “I get
frustrated when I don’t know precisely what is expected of me at work”
(aimed at discovering ambiguity acceptance) or “my personal targets
exceed those of my organisation” (which measures conscientiousness).
MacRae
has now validated HPTI in various sectors, tracking the performance of
business leaders of multinational organisations over several years, for
instance.
The research is still ongoing, but a paper published last year
demonstrated that these traits can predict subjective and objective
measures of success. In one analysis, the participants’ answers
explained about 25% of the variation in income – which is a reasonably
strong correlation (and comparable to the influence of intelligence,
say) even if it does still leave many differences unexplained. In this
study, competitiveness and ambiguity acceptance turned out to be the
strongest predictors of take-home pay, while conscientiousness seemed to
best predict the subjective measures of satisfaction.
The
researchers have also examined the relation of these traits to IQ –
another important predictor of workplace success – finding a small overlap between the two.
As
part of a wider recruitment process, the HPTI could be used to screen
high potential candidates, but MacRae says it can also aid personal
development, so that you can identify your own strengths and weaknesses
and the ways you may account for them. It could also be useful for
constructing a balanced team that reflects the full spectrum of “high
potential” traits, with a wealth of research showing that groups benefit from diverse thinking styles.
Almost everyone will fall outside the optimum range for at least some
of these traits, but this needn’t be a problem if we have colleagues who
can rein us in.
But does anyone ever meet all the criteria?
MacRae told me that he can think of a couple of individuals who fit the
bill, including the CEO of a bank in Canada. “He was almost optimal in
all of the traits,” MacRae says. “And I have to say, that was very
intimidating.” Despite those feelings of awe, the benefits of this
unique personality profile were apparent throughout the meeting. “Even
if it can be a bit scary to work with that kind of person, you know
exactly what to expect – they are someone you can trust, rely on and
respect.”
David Robson is a freelance writer based in London, UK. He is d_a_robson on Twitter.
To comment on this story or anything else you have seen on BBC Capital, please head over to our Facebook page or message us on Twitter.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário