Trump's Immigration Policies Are Making It Harder for Foreign Doctors to Work in the U.S. — And That Could Hurt Patients
It's only the latest threat to foreign medical graduates
For
the past four years, Daniel, an Israeli-born doctor completing a
medical residency in the U.S., has secured an H-1B visa for temporary
specialized workers without a hitch. But this May, without warning, the
government put his status in the U.S. in danger.
Daniel,
who withheld his last name for fear of retaliation, is one of many
foreign-born medical residents across the country who have received visa
rejections or delays since mid-April — similar to rejections thousands
of H-1B applicants in other high-paying industries have recently received — prompting a flurry of legal activity from medical groups, hospital systems and individual doctors.
His
situation is only the latest threat to international medical graduates.
Several immigration policy changes under the Trump administration have
left them deterred from or unable to practice medicine in the U.S. —
which could be disastrous for a health care system already in the midst
of a growing physician shortage. The changes could particularly affect
patient care in community and underserved urban hospitals.
“I don’t want to sound paranoid, but I just think the current
administration is trying to intimidate foreign workers and trying to
intimidate hospital systems,” Daniel says. “For somebody who’s lived in
the country for four years, that’s definitely not something I was
expecting.” (A White House spokesperson referred TIME to United States
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and did not offer a
separate comment.)
In Daniel’s case, after presenting USCIS with
the same Association of American Medical Colleges resident stipend
estimates that he’s used in his application for the last four years,
USCIS responded with a request for evidence (RFE) seeking more specific,
localized data — data that he says does not exist for resident
physicians. Unless he can come up with it or mount a convincing enough
legal argument before his visa expires on June 30 — the day before many
medical residency programs begin across the country — Daniel will have
to go back to Israel almost immediately, leaving his training unfinished
and his hospital short a doctor.
The visa situation threatens the status of thousands of training
physicians nationwide — roughly 25% of foreign medical residents in the
U.S. rely on H-1B visas — and prompted a number of medical organizations
to send a joint letter
to the USCIS on May 30 expressing concern about the change. USCIS
spokesman Michael Bars told TIME that any requests for evidence are in
line with existing laws and standards.
“USCIS recognizes the use
of valid private wage surveys by petitioners to establish the prevailing
wage for an H-1B petition,” Bars said in a statement. “However, USCIS
will continue to issue RFEs or denials, if appropriate, when officers
determine that the petitioner has not established eligibility for the
benefit sought. In keeping with the law as directed by the President’s
Buy America, Hire America Executive Order as well as the intention of
Congress, ensuring that H-1B employers are complying with all
eligibility requirements serves to safeguard the integrity of the
program to protect the wages, working conditions, and jobs of U.S.
workers.”
In a second statement, Bars added that, “USCIS continues
to review issues pertaining to private wage surveys and will consider
issuing additional guidance to our officers in the future, if needed. If
a petitioner has questions or concerns about its case, it may send an
inquiry to USCIS through appropriate customer service channels.”
While
the exact number of foreign doctors affected by policy changes isn’t
known, signs of the trend have appeared in a few ways. Fewer
non-U.S.-citizen international medical graduates registered for the
residency match this year than in any since 2005, according to the 2018 Main Residency Match report.
The number who became active applicants (7,067) was the lowest since
2012, the report adds. In 2016, for example, that number was closer to
7,500.
The downturn seems especially pronounced among residents of countries included in President Donald Trump’s original 2017 travel ban. (A revised travel ban looks likely to be upheld by the Supreme Court.) By recent estimates, about 8,000 doctors practicing in the U.S. were trained in countries included in the original ban.
Eighteen
percent fewer doctors from countries included in Trump’s executive
order came through the group that helps international medical graduates
get certifications necessary to practice in the U.S., the Educational
Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG), in 2017, according to
the group’s president, Dr. William Pinsky. There’s also been an overall
drop in the number of people applying for ECFMG certification over the
past two years, he says.
“I’m hoping that the trend, or almost
trend, that we’re seeing is because people are just waiting to see
what’s going to happen,” Pinsky says. “But the fact is, there are
opportunities for training around the world other than the United
States.”
That’s something Sanaz Attaripour-Isfahani knows well. An
international medical graduate trained in Iran and currently completing
a fellowship in the U.S., Attaripour-Isfahani says she doesn’t regret
the five-year logistical battle and multiple visa application denials it
took to get here for residency. But she’s already seen that not
everyone feels that way: Her sister, a doctor in Iran, decided to pursue
residency in Canada, because the obstacles to getting into the U.S. are
too great.
“I am very proud of what I gained here. [But] she does not think it’s
worth it,” Attaripour-Isfahani says. “In the future, definitely, we
will have a lot less Iranian doctors, comparing with what we had over
the last 10 years.”
International medical graduates may
increasingly gravitate toward programs in Europe, the U.K. and Canada if
political trends continue, says Dr. Yusuke Tsugawa, a Japanese-trained
doctor who has studied international medical graduates and is now an
assistant professor of medicine at the University of California Los
Angeles’ David Geffen School of Medicine. “In addition to the actual
changes that have been made in the last one or two years, I think
there’s some concerns about uncertainty around what’s going to happen in
the future,” Tsugawa says. “They don’t want to come to the U.S. to
start their training and get kicked out during the training, because
that would be devastating for their careers.”
That uncertainty
could have repercussions for patients, since foreign-born physicians
occupy a pivotal place in the U.S. health care system. About an eighth
of the resident workforce was born in a foreign country. With the
American College of Physicians already projecting a shortage
of between 40,800 and 105,000 doctors by 2030, any drop in the number
of physicians who choose to practice in the U.S. could have significant
effects.
Underserved areas may be the hardest hit. Studies have shown
that international medical graduates are more likely to practice in
inner cities and rural communities, and to enter essential practice
areas such as primary care and family medicine — two fields U.S. grads
are increasingly eschewing in favor of high-paying specialties like
surgery and dermatology. Because of that trend, “Just training more
doctors in the current system in the United States will overcompensate
for specialists, and under-compensate for primary care docs,” says Dr.
G. Richard Olds, president of St. George’s University in Grenada, a
leading provider of foreign-trained U.S. doctors. International medical
graduates “play a very important role, because we have had an
insufficient number of U.S.-trained doctors for some time.”
There’s
also evidence that international medical graduates provide care that is
just as good, if not better, than that of domestically schooled
doctors. A 2017 study
by Tsugawa found that patients treated by international medical
graduates had slightly lower 30-day mortality rates than people at the
same hospital who were treated by U.S.-trained physicians. The two
groups also had similar rates of hospital readmission, a metric often
used to quantify quality of care. These results underscore the talent of
international medical graduates, Tsugawa says.
“I don’t think the
quality of the U.S. medical schools are worse than the quality of that
in foreign countries,” Tsugawa says. “I think what explains it better is
that the selection criteria for foreign medical graduates in the U.S.
is pretty rigorous.” The residency match rate for Americans this year
was 94%, meaning the vast majority of American students on track to
graduate from U.S. medical schools were accepted to a training program.
Only 56% of non-U.S.-citizen international medical graduates, by
contrast, matched with a residency program this year.
Dr. Anupam Jena, a professor of health care policy at Harvard Medical
School, agrees that the quality of international medical graduate care
tends to be high. “We’re attracting the best and the brightest from all
over the world,” he says. “Not surprisingly, the best and the brightest
from India or China or Russia or wherever are probably going to be
pretty good.”
Still, it can be difficult and costly to secure
visas for foreign clinicians. That’s especially daunting for small,
community-hospital-based residency programs — the type that tend to
produce critically needed primary care physicians and doctors who end up
practicing in underserved areas. “If you have a program with 15
first-year residents and one or two don’t show up, it could be
devastating for the program,” ECFMG’s Pinsky says. As a result, small
hospitals may simply not take the risk, leaving international medical
graduates who don’t make the cut for the most selective programs in the
lurch.
Some schools that did take the risk may be punished this
year, given the current situation with H-1B visas. The letter sent to
the USCIS by various medical groups notes that, for “at least one
internal medicine training program,” 60% of incoming residents are on,
or are supposed to be on, H-1B visas.
“I don’t even want to know
what’s going to happen if [programs like that] have to start without
having any of those people working,” Daniel, the medical resident, says.
“That is really going to affect patient care.”
