Making the Most of Your Writing Feedback
Giving
high-quality feedback on student writing can be a challenge, but these
strategies help maximize its impact on your students.
Providing
feedback on student writing is one of the most important, most
challenging aspects of a teacher’s job. It’s important because feedback
is critical to student learning; it’s challenging because of time
constraints and the number of students at varying levels in our classes.
Making sure your feedback is specific, ongoing, action-oriented, and reasonable—the SOAR method, a strategy I developed—helps maximize its impact on your students.
Feedback falls into two categories: the what and the how. The what of writing deals with content. Specific feedback here includes guiding students if they need more evidence, stronger claims, or further analysis. If they’re writing fiction, you might suggest adding more dialogue for character development or further detail to establish setting.
Making sure your feedback is specific, ongoing, action-oriented, and reasonable—the SOAR method, a strategy I developed—helps maximize its impact on your students.
Specific
Feedback is often lost on students because it’s too vague. Comments like “great job,” “good writing,” or even “needs better organization” fall flat with students because they’re not tied to specific words, phrases, sentences, or paragraphs in writing.Feedback falls into two categories: the what and the how. The what of writing deals with content. Specific feedback here includes guiding students if they need more evidence, stronger claims, or further analysis. If they’re writing fiction, you might suggest adding more dialogue for character development or further detail to establish setting.
The how is the writing itself. Specific feedback here can include
comments concerning the organization of the information, rhetorical
strategies, style, voice, and conventions.
Teachers who teach writing across the curriculum and feel
uncomfortable assessing the how can focus their feedback on the what
since that is the part of the writing they’ll feel most comfortable
assessing.
Ongoing
Fortunately, teachers are slowly breaking away from grading final
products only and are offering feedback throughout the different stages
of writing. The biggest hindrance to ongoing feedback is time, but
narrowing the focus of the feedback can help you meet this challenge.
For example, a science teacher may choose to focus on one particular
section of a lab report each time; an English language arts teacher may
choose to focus on one particular stage of writing, shifting from one
stage to another throughout the course of the year.
Students can take the lead by asking for feedback on a Google doc throughout the writing process. Kaizena
allows teachers to leave voice notes on a student paper, making it easy
to check in and comment on work during different stages in the process.
Stations with self-guiding questions for reflection can be a great
way to allow students to move through the writing process at their own
pace, and the teacher can rotate through the stations, addressing small
groups of students instead of the whole class.
Action-Oriented
Many teachers fall into the trap of editing student writing
by focusing on marking grammar mistakes instead of offering feedback to
move students forward in their writing. Helping students take specific
steps is key in building a growth mindset in writing—students must see
that the action taken can benefit their future writing and not just
correct a mistake in the current paper.
Conferring is key when offering action-oriented feedback. I recently
sat in the hall conferring with students about college essays. This
allowed me time to say things like, “Notice in this paragraph how you
begin seven sentences with ‘I’ followed by an action verb. How can you
vary some of these sentences so they don’t all sound the same? The
content is good, but let’s work on sentence variety.” The student would
then offer a suggestion on how to start a sentence differently, and we
would further discuss it. The student not only improves this piece but
will be more likely to carry these ideas to future writing because the
feedback results in an action step.
Teachers are not the only ones who can provide action-oriented
feedback—peer editing with specific action-oriented writing suggestions
can also move your writers forward.
Reasonable
When a student receives a paper with markings all over it, they can
become overwhelmed and discouraged, which often prevents them from
taking proper steps for revision or for growth as a writer in general.
This can be remedied in several ways.
Select a focus for feedback with each assignment. Sometimes I’ll tell
students, “I’ll be offering feedback on transitions in this paper,” or
“The focus of feedback for this writing is on the amount of evidence.” I
try to give feedback on both the what and the how of writing. This is
especially strategic if I’ve given a mini-lesson on an area that I want
students to focus on in their writing.
Another successful strategy is giving a Glow and a Grow comment
highlighting a specific area that a student did particularly well on and
one that needs improvement. Glow and Grow comments both celebrate and
challenge student writing. Students refer to past Grow and Glow comments
and goals before writing future assignments so they can be reminded of
where they are strong, in order to continue doing these things well, and
to be aware of areas for growth, in order to push themselves in these
areas.
Feedback is more than a grade and should be one of the driving
factors in helping students set learning goals and take charge of their
own writing and learning. Help students SOAR to success in learning with
quality feedback.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário